Management of metastatic melanoma during pregnancy
- S R D Johnston, consultant medical oncologista (stephen@icr.ac.uk),
- K Broadley, consultant in palliative medicineb,
- G Henson, consultant obstetriciand,
- C Fisher, consultant histopathologistc,
- M Henk, consultant clinical oncologista,
- M E Gore, head of skin and melanoma unita
- a Melanoma Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ
- b Palliative Care Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ
- c Department of Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital
- d Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF
- University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada
- a Melanoma Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ
- b Palliative Care Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital
- c Department of Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital
- d Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF
- Correspondence to: Dr Johnston
About 35% of women with melanoma are of child bearing age, and the coexistence of melanoma and pregnancy is increasing.1 Many doctors recommend that women wait two to three years after successful treatment for melanoma before becoming pregnant as most recurrences occur during this time. This advice is inadequate. Doctors need to inform these women about the considerable problems that may arise if relapse occurs while they are pregnant. We present our recent experience of this difficult situation: malignant melanoma within the maternal intervillous space, invading into the core of the villus. Immunostaining for S100 protein and HMB45 was positive, and staining for human chorionic gonadotropin was negative in the tumour cells.
Case report
A 41 year old woman presented with left axillary lymphadenopathy. A superficial spreading melanoma had been removed from her back two years previously. Radical lymph node dissection was performed. All nodes contained metastatic melanoma that stained positive for S100 and HMB45. There was evidence of extranodal tumour towards the deep resection margin, but her chest radiograph and liver ultrasonography were both normal. The woman had a professional career and had never been pregnant.
The patient presented four months later with a short history of low back pain. Clinical examination showed no abnormalities and her neurological signs were normal. However, plain radiographs of the lumbar spine and computed tomography showed that the 8th thoracic vertebra had collapsed, associated with a soft tissue mass consistent with metastatic melanoma. The spinal cord was not affected.
The patient reported that she was 12 weeks pregnant. Termination was discussed and the patient was counselled, but she and her partner were determined to continue with the pregnancy. Since she had no neurological signs of cord compression and her pain was intense, she was given a single palliative dose of radiotherapy to the affected …
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27