- Alan Fitchet, specialist registrar in cardiology (Alan.Fitchet@mhc.cmht.nwest.nhs.uk),
- Adam P Fitzpatrick, consultant cardiologist
- University Department of Cardiology, Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL
- Correspondence to: Dr Fitchet
- Accepted 8 September 1997
Venous air embolism should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute pulmonary oedema
Central venous air embolism is recognised as a cause of acute cardiorespiratory collapse, and up to 50% mortality has been reported.1 A rare and more insidious presentation is that of non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.
Case report
A 71 year old woman presented with irregular palpitations. Resting 12 lead electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm at 95 beats per minute, first degree heart block (PR interval 360 ms), left axis deviation, and anteroseptal Q waves suggestive of a previous myocardial infarction. These results were similar to those seen in an electrocardiogram performed in 1991.
Asymptomatic episodes of complete atrioventricular block, frequent ventricular extrasystoles, and infrequent episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were found on Holter monitoring. She was admitted to hospital to await transfer for insertion of a pacemaker. An Arrowset 8.5 French gauge Swan-Ganz introducer (Arrow International, Reading, PA) was inserted into the right subclavian vein, and a 6 French gauge temporary pacing wire was passed through it. A chest radiograph taken after insertion was normal.
During the first 24 hours after insertion amiodarone hydrochloride 1325 mg was given through the side arm of the subclavian catheter followed by 200 mg orally daily thereafter for 5 days. Displacement of the pacing wire twice in one night occurred 6 days after insertion and necessitated repositioning. A stable paced rhythm of 80 beats per minute was achieved, but she developed clinical and radiographic evidence of pulmonary oedema within 4 hours of the pacing wire being repositioned. Repeated doses of diuretics were given intravenously over 6 hours but did not relieve the patient's symptoms. Because her condition continued to deteriorate, she was …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012