Centralisation of care leads to better outcome
- David Hadden, Honorary professor of endocrinologya,
- Anthony Traub, Consultant obstetriciana
- a Diabetes Pregnancy Clinic, Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA
- b Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Medicine, UMDS, St Thomas's Hospital, London SE1 7EH
- c Department of Obstetrics, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
- d Medical Department V, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
- e Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Steno Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus
- f Department of Obstetrics, Aalborg Hospital, 9000 Aalborg
- g Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Aarhus
- h Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD9 6RJ
- i Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool L14 3LD,
- j School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX
- k Fetal and Infant Pathology, University of Liverpool
- l Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool
- m Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7NJ
Editor—The finding of a persistently poor outcome of pregnancy in women with insulin dependent diabetes in two (northern) English regions is an important statement of the problem.1 2 Both studies provide figures and show outcomes that are no different from those widely reported in the past. Unfortunately, neither give evidence of any degree of centralisation of obstetric or diabetic care, with on-site neonatal intensive care, although this is a proved means of improving the outcome of pregnancy for diabetic mothers.3 The St Vincent declaration guidelines on the outcome of pregnancy, referred to in the accompanying editorial (p 263), are based on the Scandinavian reports held up as examples of good practice and state that “an interdisciplinary team should provide centralized diabetic pregnancy care in a hospital treating at least 20–30 cases a year. Pregnant diabetic patients should regularly visit the centre, before, during, and after the pregnancy.”
The combined diabetes pregnancy clinic at the Royal Maternity Hospital in Belfast has existed for over 40 years, and outcome audit has shown the value of this approach.4 In an audit of over 800 pregnancies in diabetic mothers identified in Northern Ireland over the past 10 years the perinatal mortality in mothers cared for throughout at this centralised clinic during 1985–95 was 27/1000, compared with 70/1000 for patients referred later in pregnancy and 33/1000 for those mothers cared for in other maternity hospitals in Northern Ireland.
Overall perinatal mortality for the whole population of Northern Ireland (1.5 million) during this decade was 9.3/1000 total births, so that even at a centralised clinic there is still an increased risk in diabetic pregnancy. Centralisation of care and improved cooperation among the obstetricians and diabetes physicians within a health region will lead to a better outcome.5
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
Rate of congenital malformations is almost certainly gross underestimate
- Clara Lowy, Reader in medicineb
- a Diabetes Pregnancy Clinic, Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA
- b Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Medicine, UMDS, St Thomas's Hospital, London SE1 7EH
- c Department of Obstetrics, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
- d Medical Department V, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
- e Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Steno Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus
- f Department of Obstetrics, Aalborg Hospital, 9000 Aalborg
- g Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Aarhus
- h Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD9 6RJ
- i Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool L14 3LD,
- j School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX
- k Fetal and Infant Pathology, University of Liverpool
- l Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool
- m Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7NJ
Editor—Casson et al make several misrepresentations …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012