Clinical Review

Lesson of the week: Pneumatic compression boots for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis: beware occult arterial disease

BMJ 1998; 316 doi: (Published 07 February 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;316:454
  1. M J Oakley, specialist registrara,
  2. E F Wheelwright, consultantb,
  3. P J James, consultanta
  1. a Orthopaedic Directorate, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF
  2. b Orthopaedic Directorate, Stobhill Hospital NHS Trust, Glasgow G21 3UW
  1. Correspondence to: Mr James
  • Accepted 19 May 1997


Prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after joint replacement remains contentious.1 The incidence of deep vein thrombosis is between 45% and 75%.2 3 4 5 The rate of fatal pulmonary embolism is considered to be 1-3%,2 3 4 5 but this is a gross overestimate.1 Pharmacological techniques for preventing deep vein thrombosis (such as dextran 40, aspirin, warfarin, and heparins) are effective in reducing its incidence but are associated with important complications such as haemorrhage, wound haematoma, and haemarthrosis. 3 6 7 8

Mechanical methods such as intermittent pneumatic compression devices have been developed to avoid these problems. These provide similar prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis 8 9 10 and are considered free of important complications.8 We report the occurrence of ulcers in patients using these devices according to approved guidelines.


Consideration of the evidence led the orthopaedic directorate of Glasgow Royal Infirmary and Stobhill NHS Trust to change its policy on prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis at the end of 1995. Under the previous protocol heparin had been used in combination with graduated compression stockings. All patients having elective surgery who are at moderate or high risk of deep vein thrombosis now wear graduated compression stockings on both legs under pneumatic compression boots (AV Impulse System, Novamedix, Andover) (fig 1 …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution


* For online subscription