Clinical governance: fine words or action?

BMJ 1998; 316 doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7127.297 (Published 24 January 1998)
Cite this as: BMJ 1998;316:297

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Nick Black, professor of health services researcha
  1. a London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT

    The current purchaser efficiency index has resulted in perverse incentives and a distortion of clinical priorities.1 In the name of increased efficiency, cost saving measures have been rewarded while few attempts have been made to assess the quality of care provided. When attempts have been made, variation has often been shown in the quality of care delivered and the outcomes achieved by different providers.

    In a significant and welcome change from the previous administration, the new government recognises these problems and proposes several measures to deal with them—at every level of the NHS. At the centre, a National Institute of Clinical Excellence will promote clinical and cost effective care by producing research based guidelines. National service frameworks will also set out the patterns and levels of service which should be provided for major …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL