Commentary: Promoting testing is no substitute for recognising riskBMJ 1998; 316 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7127.295 (Published 24 January 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;316:295
- Noël Gill, consultant epidemiologist ([email protected])a
- a AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Disease Centre, PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London NW9 5EQ
Given the continuing transmission of HIV infection in western Europe, preventing new infections and mitigating the effects of infections that have already occurred are major public health priorities. Testing blood donations for HIV has an established role in preventing transmission of the virus. In other areas of primary and secondary prevention, the case for large scale HIV testing is less clear.
With the advent of effective measures to prevent mother to infant transmission, including the use of zidovudine in pregnancy for HIV infected women, there is a strong case for these women to have their infection diagnosed well before they give birth. In England, especially in London, much needs to be done to improve the situation; less than a quarter of …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial