Intended for healthcare professionals

General Practice

The validity of general practitioners' self assessment of knowledge: cross sectional study

BMJ 1997; 315 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7120.1426 (Published 29 November 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:1426
  1. Jocelyn Tracey (j.tracey{at}auckland.ac.nz), assistant directora,
  2. Bruce Arroll, associate professorb,
  3. Philip Barham, directora,
  4. David Richmond, dean of undergraduate studiesc
  1. a Goodfellow Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
  2. b Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Auckland
  3. c Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Auckland
  1. Correspondence to: Dr Tracey
  • Accepted 11 August 1997

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether general practitioners can make accurate self assessments of their knowledge in specific areas.

Design: 67 general practitioners completed a self assessment of their level of knowledge over a variety of topics using a nine point semantic differential scale. An objective assessment of their knowledge was then made by administering true-false tests on two of the topics: thyroid disorders and non-insulin dependent diabetes. The study was repeated with another group of 60 general practitioners, using sexually transmitted diseases as the topic

Setting: General practices in New Zealand.

Subjects: Random sample of 67 general practitioners in Auckland.

Main outcome measure: Test scores for self assessment and for actual knowledge.

Results: Correlations between self assessments and test scores were poor for all three topics studied (r=0.19 for thyroid disorders, 0.21 for non-insulin dependent diabetes, 0.19 for sexually transmitted diseases).

Conclusions: As general practitioners cannot accurately assess their own level of knowledge on a given topic, professional development programmes that rely on the doctors' self perceptions to assess their needs are likely to be seriously flawed.

Key message

  • Doctors' perception of knowledge in areas of common practice is no indication of actual knowledge

  • Continuing medical education and other professional development activities that rely on the doctors' self perception to assess their needs are likely to be seriously flawed

  • To make professional development activities more efficient and effective a more objective assessment of needs is necessary

Footnotes

  • Accepted 11 August 1997
View Full Text