- Christoph R Meier (chrmeier{at}bu.edu), research associatea,
- Hershel Jick, associate professor of medicinea
- a Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Boston University Medical Center, 11 Muzzey Street, Lexington, MA, 02173, USA
- Correspondence to: Dr Meier
- Accepted 21 May 1997
Introduction
Acute polyarthralgia has been reported in five patients in association with the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole.1 These patients did not have rheumatoid arthritis, concurrent infections, or connective tissue disorders, and their symptoms resolved after stopping omeprazole.1 We compared the relative risk of developing acute idiopathic polyarthralgia during and after exposure to omeprazole, ranitidine, or cimetidine, antiulcer drugs used for similar indications.
Subjects, methods, and results
We conducted a nested case-control analysis using data from a UK general practitioner research database which provides the demographics, medical conditions, and drug prescriptions of over four million people.2 3 4
Cohort members comprised people aged 20–60 who had received at least one prescription for omeprazole, ranitidine, or cimetidine between 1 January 1992 and 31 December 1994 and had at least one year's medical history recorded on computer. Subjects were excluded if they had a history of idiopathic multiple arthralgia or had pre-existing rheumatic disease, gout, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic liver and renal disease, cancer, or diabetes mellitus. We followed up each cohort member for 360 days after they had been prescribed one of the drugs, identifying people who had idiopathic polyarthralgia for the first time leading to a referral to a specialist. We reviewed referral letters and laboratory test results of potentially eligible cases without knowing if they had been exposed to one of the drugs.
About 80 000 people were eligible for the cohort. There were about 90 000 prescriptions for omeprazole, 170 000 for ranitidine, and 120 000 for cimetidine. We identified 100 patients (mean age 46 years, 75 women) as having idiopathic polyarthralgia for the first time and 361 eligible controls (range 1–6 controls per case), matched for practice, age (within three years), sex, and date of diagnosis. Risk estimates in a matched analysis were obtained through conditional logistic regression in SAS.5
Patients who were currently taking omeprazole were not at higher risk than those currently taking ranitidine or cimetidine. Compared with ranitidine and cimetidine, the relative risk estimates for current and recent past use of omeprazole combined were 1.1 (95% confidence interval 0.2 to 5.6) and 0.8 (0.3 to 2.8), respectively, after adjustment for body mass index (<25, 25-30, and >30 kg/m2), smoking (current smoker, former smoker, non-smoker, and unknown), and whether the patient had previously taken one of the drugs studied. The risk of developing acute polyarthralgia from all three drugs was not substantially higher for current use compared with recent past use (drug last taken 1–90 days before the index date), past use (91-180 days before the index date), or distant past use (181-360 days before the index date) (1). The risk of idiopathic polyarthralgia was not associated with duration of total exposure to the study drug before diagnosis, and dose dependence was not seen among current and recent past users of the three study drugs.
Adjusted relative risks of developing polyarthralgia after exposure to antiulcer drugs omeprazole, ranitidine, and cimetidine
Comment
Our results suggest that omeprazole use is not associated with an increased risk of inducing polyarthralgia compared with ranitidine and cimetidine. The absence of increased risk of current drug use compared with use in the past or distant past makes a causal role for the study drugs unlikely. These findings, however, do not rule out the possibility that these drugs may sometimes cause adverse effects on the musculoskeletal system in particular people.
Acknowledgments
Funding: The Boston program is supported partly by grants from Astra Hässle, Bayer, Berlex Laboratories, Glaxo Wellcome, Hoechst, RW Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer. CRM is supported in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Ciba-Geigy Jubilaeums-Stiftung, Basel, Switzerland.
Conflict of interest: None.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012