- Isabelle Durand-Zaleski (zaleski@lmm.jussieu.fr), assistant professorb,
- Cyrille Colin, assistant professorc,
- Claudine Blum-Boisgard, professorc
- a Department of Public Health, Henri Mondor Hospital, Paris, France
- b Claude Bernard University, Lyon I, Lyon, France
- c René Descartes University, Paris V, Paris, France
- Correspondence to: Dr Isabelle Durand-Zaleski HITEQ, Henri Mondor Hospital, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre deTassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
- Accepted 25 April 1997
Introduction
In the five years up to 1996, expenditure on healthcare in France increased at an average yearly rate of 4-5%; by 1996 it amounted to about 10% of the gross domestic product.1 2 Various cost containment programmes have been proposed and implemented, many assuming that high costs are a result of unnecessary tests and treatments. We describe and make a preliminary assessment of the latest of these, introduced in France from 1994 onwards, which combines mandatory practice guidelines on procedures and drug prescribing with a system of fines for doctors who do not comply.
Background
Two thirds of French doctors are in private practice and are paid on a fee for service basis. The French social security administration provides medical cover for 99.6% of the population, and 80% of the fee the patient pays to a private physician is reimbursed by social security. Private insurance companies reimburse the remaining portion for most people. The social security administration and the doctors' unions have negotiated contractual medical fees and these are paid to most general practitioners and to 60% of specialists. Basic fees per consultation in 1997 were F110 (£11) for a general practitioner and F150 (£15) for a specialist but additional fees could be claimed for medical or surgical procedures performed during the consultation. Thus, physicians receive most of their income from social security.2
The French healthcare system has historically provided freedom of choice for patients and doctors. Patients can see any general practitioner or specialist they choose, with no limit to the number of doctors seen or the frequency of visits. Doctors have been free to request any investigations or procedures and have prescribed as they pleased—with the exception of a few drugs restricted to hospital use. This combination of freedom of choice, the high proportion of medical expenditure …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27