Editorials

The use of statins: a case of misleading priorities?

BMJ 1997; 315 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7112.826 (Published 04 October 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:826

National guidance that does not link costs and benefits is worthless

  1. Nick Freemantle (nf2@york.ac.uk), Senior research fellowa,
  2. Ruth Barbour, Medical adviserb,
  3. Richard Johnson, Pharmaceutical adviserb,
  4. Mike Marchment, Chief executiveb,
  5. Andrew Kennedy, General practitionerc
  1. a Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO1 5DD
  2. b Warwickshire Health Authority, Warwick CV34 4DE
  3. c Croft Medical Centre, Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire CV31 1SA

    Last month the NHS Executive distributed to health authorities and general practitioners a statement from the Standing Medical Advisory Committee on the use of lipid lowering drugs.1 This argues for a strategy of treatment on the basis of underlying risk, but it adopts a level that is probably unachievable, fails to present the evidence, and ignores cost effectiveness. In so doing it jeopardises the objective of targeting high risk patients, but it also raises questions about the worth of guidance that does not link benefits and costs.

    The statement recommends that, having considered other methods of reducing the risk of coronary heart disease, clinicians should give statins to the following three groups of patients. The first priority are patients who have had a myocardial infarction and have low density lipoprotein values of 3.2 mmol/l or more; second are those with angina or other clinically overt atherosclerotic disease with low density lipoprotein values of 3.7 mmol/l or more; and third come those with a high risk of developing coronary heart disease according to the revised Sheffield tables2 and a low density lipoprotein value of 3.7 mmol/l or more. The statement estimates that meeting all three priorities will mean treating 8.2% of the population aged 35-69. No recommendations are made for patients aged over 70, although there is no evidence that benefits are limited to younger patients. The statement was sent …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe