Surgical training

BMJ 1997; 315 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7100.124a (Published 12 July 1997)
Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:124.2

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Training must be of highest possible quality

  1. Dermot C O'Riordan, Presidenta,
  2. Nick Shaper, Honorary secretarya
  1. a Association of Surgeons in Training, London WC2A 3PN
  2. b Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9DW

    Editor—T J Crofts and colleagues articulate many of the concerns of surgical trainees.1 The outcome of surgical training is a function of both the quality and the quantity of the training. Concern about surgical training tends to concentrate on the quantity of training, particularly the shortened training period and reduced hours of work. If these are considered in isolation it is easy to become alarmed by the prospect of underqualified surgeons coming off the production line. The changes brought about with the introduction of the specialist registrar grade and the new deal must be accompanied by an improvement in the quality of surgical training. Without adequate funding and an increase in the number of consultants the experiment will fail.

    The indicator operations listed by Croft and colleagues are mostly elective procedures. A one in two rota would not rectify the potential deficit in the number required for training. To correct the …

    Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

    Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL