An author error occurred in this paper by Carolyn DiGuiseppi and colleagues (8 March, pp 710-3). The fourth and fifth sentences in the third paragraph of the results should have read: “Girls showed substantially larger declines in walking (23% [not 30%]) and cycling (39% [not 64%]) and smaller increases in car travel (35%) than did boys (15%, 23%, [not 18%, 30%] and 45% respectively). Children aged 10-14 showed the largest decline in walking (26% [not 35%]) compared with children aged 0-4 (9% [not 10%] and 5-9 (17% [not 20%].” These changes do not alter the meaning of the two sentences or affect any of the subsequent discussion.







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27