Undermines rational planning of health services
- Seán Boyle, Fellow in health policy analysisa
- a King's Fund, London W1M 0AN
Among health service managers, healthcare professionals, and the public there is almost universal agreement that the private finance initiative has failed as an alternative source of capital funds for the NHS. The amount of public sector capital has reduced—by 15% in the past two years—but when the election was announced in March not one major privately financed hospital project had started. Most criticism has focused on this failure. In any case there is a belief that schemes under the private finance initiative can work only at a cost to the NHS (in terms of future payments for facilities) which will prove unacceptable. Hospital provision over 30 years is a high risk enterprise, and returns on private investment must reflect this risk.
An article by Pollock et al in this issue (p 1266) raises two further problems with the private finance initiative.1 The first is a lack of openness surrounding the whole process, resulting from commercial sensitivity. The second lies at the heart of the planning process for public services: the questionable assumptions that lie behind many hospital schemes in the pipeline. These criticisms are linked. The ability …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Should UK membership exams be held overseas? Yes
Published 9 February 2012
Why not use ultrasound for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer for both the exclusion criteria for recruitment and for diagnosis as outcome variable
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Can the severity of menopausal symptoms be predicted?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Does the BMJ have a particular ideology to pursue in assisted dying?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 9 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (5 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012