Editorials

The private finance initiative

BMJ 1997; 314 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7089.1214 (Published 26 April 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;314:1214

Undermines rational planning of health services

  1. Seán Boyle, Fellow in health policy analysisa
  1. a King's Fund, London W1M 0AN

    Among health service managers, healthcare professionals, and the public there is almost universal agreement that the private finance initiative has failed as an alternative source of capital funds for the NHS. The amount of public sector capital has reduced—by 15% in the past two years—but when the election was announced in March not one major privately financed hospital project had started. Most criticism has focused on this failure. In any case there is a belief that schemes under the private finance initiative can work only at a cost to the NHS (in terms of future payments for facilities) which will prove unacceptable. Hospital provision over 30 years is a high risk enterprise, and returns on private investment must reflect this risk.

    An article by Pollock et al in this issue (p 1266) raises two further problems with the private finance initiative.1 The first is a lack of openness surrounding the whole process, resulting from commercial sensitivity. The second lies at the heart of the planning process for public services: the questionable assumptions that lie behind many hospital schemes in the pipeline. These criticisms are linked. The ability …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe