The future of locality commissioning
BMJ 1997; 314 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7089.1212 (Published 26 April 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;314:1212- Nicholas Mays, Director of Health Services Researcha
- a Policy Institute, King's Fund, London W1M 0AN
GP fundholding was introduced by the Conservative government to involve general practitioners in shaping local health services1: individual practices acted as agents for their patients, using their own budgets to bring about quality and efficiency improvements in hospital and community health services. A range of alternative, unofficial schemes has emerged at local level (non-fundholding, general practitioner led commissioning, and locality commissioning2 3 4) led by non-fundholders who want to help shape local health services but are sceptical about holding an individual practice budget. These schemes have received less attention than fundholding and its derivatives,5 6 but this issue of the BMJ includes a rare attempt to evaluate locality commissioning in Avon, where there seem to be modest benefits at a much lower cost than …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.