UK doctors breach guidance on persistent vegetative stateBMJ 1997; 314 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.535e (Published 22 February 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;314:535
- Kathryn Godfrey
Doctors' views on the management of patients in a persistent vegetative state conflict with official guidelines, says a report published last week.
The report, produced by the Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College, London, is the first large scale survey of the views of UK doctors on this subject. Of the 1882 consultants in neurosurgery, neurology, orthopaedic surgery, and rehabilitation medicine who were contacted, 1027 replied.
The results showed that over 90% of doctors who replied said that it can be appropriate not to treat acute infections and life threatening conditions in patients in a persistent vegetative state. Almost three quarters said that it was sometimes appropriate to withdraw artificial …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial