Many claims about passive smoking are inadequately justifiedBMJ 1997; 314 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7077.371 (Published 01 February 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;314:371
- Peter N Lee, Independent consultant in statistics and epidemiologya
- a P N Lee Statistics and Computing Ltd, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5DA
Editor–George Davey Smith and Andrew N Phillips suggest that the tobacco industry attempts to promote confusion about passive smoking and disease.1 Although I was not involved with the report of the European Working Group on Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer, their central concern, I am cited as an “enthusiastic recipient of tobacco industry financial support who … has presented models … most favourable to the tobacco industry case.” Insinuating that I distort evidence for money is most unfair. I am widely consulted on many issues …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial