Letters

Measurement error

BMJ 1997; 314 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7074.147 (Published 11 January 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;314:147

A constant within subject standard deviation cannot be assumed a priori

  1. Jacques Massé, Assistant professor in biochemistrya
  1. a Department of Biochemistry, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, Quebec, Canada G1S 4L8
  2. b Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
  3. cSchool of Management, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY
  4. dSouthmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB

    Editor–In their statistical note about measurement error J Martin Bland and Douglas G Altman state that there is no point in estimating within subject standard deviation if we cannot assume that it is the same for all subjects.1 This assumption, however, does not hold true in every clinically relevant situation. For example, the within subject standard deviation of many analyses is increased in patients from intensive care units. Even outside these extreme conditions, a constant within subject standard deviation cannot be assumed a priori. Homogeneity of within subject standard deviation must be verified before the estimate obtained from analysis of variance can be applied to determine whether two consecutive results in a single patient are truly different.2

    When within subject standard deviation is not constant from one patient to another (presence of heterogeneity) the use of a single “mean” within subject standard deviation to estimate repeatability will underestimate the variability for several patients and will possibly lead to false conclusions about the clinical importance of the …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe