Misdiagnosis certainly occurs

BMJ 1996; 313 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7062.944 (Published 12 October 1996)
Cite this as: BMJ 1996;313:944.1

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Nancy L Childs, Medical director, inpatient brain injury programme,
  2. Walt N Mercer, Director of research, psychology department
  1. Healthcare Rehabilitation Center, 1106 West Dittmar Road, Austin, TX 78745, USA

    EDITOR,—It is gratifying, though alarming, that Keith Andrews and colleagues' study1 so closely duplicates our findings regarding misdiagnosis of the vegetative state.2 The accompanying editorial by Ronald Cranford, which suggests that the rate of misdiagnosis is a new finding and that Andrews and colleagues' methods were questionable, merits critical comment.3

    Aside from the implication that physicians who provide rehabilitative care are scientifically suspect, Cranford shows his inexperience in the neurorehabilitation of brain injured patients when he …

    Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

    Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL