Sex related differences in short and long term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction: 10 year follow up of 3073 patients in database of first Danish verapamil infarction trialBMJ 1996; 313 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7050.137 (Published 20 July 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;313:137
- Jensen S Galatius, registrara,
- J Launbjerg, senior registrara,
- L Spange Mortensen, statisticianb,
- J Fischer Hansen, head of department of cardiologyc
- a Department of Cardiology B, National University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- b Danish Computing Centre for Research and Education, UNI-C, Aarhus, Denmark
- c Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr Galatius-Jensen
- Accepted 18 April 1996
Objective: To re-examine the prevailing hypothesis that women fare worse than men after acute myocardial infarction.
Design: 10 year follow up of all patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction registered in the database of the Danish verapamil infarction trial in 1979-81.
Setting: 16 coronary care units, covering a fifth of the total Danish population.
Patients: 3073 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction, 738 (24%) women and 2335 (76%) men.
Main outcome measures: Early mortality (before day 15). For patients alive on day 15: mortality, cause of death, admission with recurrent infarction, and mortality after reinfarction.
Results: Early mortality increased significantly with age (P<0.0001) but was not significantly related to sex, with a 15 day mortality of 17% in women and 16% in men. Adjustment for age and sex simultaneously revealed a significant interaction (P=0.02) between these variables, with a greater increase with age in early mortality for men than for women (early mortality was equal for the two sexes at age 64 years). Ten year mortality in patients alive on day 15 was 58.8%. The overall age adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for women versus men was 0.90 (0.80 to 1.01); 0.90 (0.78 to 1.04) for 10 year reinfarction (48.8%); and 0.98 (0.82 to 1.16) for 10 year mortality after reinfarction (82.3%). No difference in cause of death was found between the sexes. With a follow up of up to 10 years for patients alive on day 15 mortality, rate of reinfarction, and mortality after reinfarction increased with increasing age (P<0.0001).
Conclusion: Sex by itself is not a risk factor after acute myocardial infarction.
Women and men have similar mortality at 10 year follow up
Causes of death are not different between the sexes
Women and men have similar reinfarction rates and similar subsequent mortality
The prevailing view regarding sex as an independent prognostic factor after acute myocar- dial infarction may be due to present differences in treatment of women and men, selection bias, and the interpretation of the role of age differences
The prevailing view regarding prognosis after acute myocardial infarction is that women fare worse than men,1 2 3 4 5 6 despite conflicting results regarding this subject before1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 as well as after5 6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 the thrombolytic era. Some investigators indicate that higher age and worse baseline variables explain at least part of the excess mortality in women,5 8 10 11 15 16 17 24 whereas others regard sex as an independent prognostic factor.1 2 3 6 20 21
There are relatively few large scale studies with more than 2500 patients with acute myocardial infarction, and these have studied mortality only in hospital and up to one year,3 4 6 17 20 except for one retrospective study with a 12 year follow up.16
To clarify the nature of the prognosis in the two sexes after acute myocardial infarction we conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective 10 year follow up study with 3073 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. We compared the sexes regarding mortality before day 15 and, for patients alive on day 15, mortality, reinfarction rate, and mortality after reinfarction up to 10 years. The causes of death in the sexes were also compared.
Patients and methods
Follow up—Follow up time for mortality and reinfarction was about 10 years and up to 10 years with respect to mortality after reinfarction, as follow up related to this end point started at the time of reinfarction. Information on death was obtained from the National Person Registration Office on 1 October 1990. The causes of death were registered from the death certificates and classified as new infarction (International Classification of Diseases, eighth revision, code 410), other cardiac death (codes 411-4 and 427-9) and other causes, respectively. Information on admissions with recurrent infarction (code 410) was obtained from the Central County Patient Registry.
Statistical analysis—Survival was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and survival expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals. Comparison of event rates in the sexes from day 15 and up to 10 years was done after adjustment for age with the Cox regression model. Mortality and reinfarction curves for the sexes were constructed from the estimated Cox model by using the three ages representing the quartiles. Proportions regarding death before day 15 and causes of death were compared by means of the X2 test. The influence of age and sex and the simultaneous influence of the two on mortality before day 15 was analysed with logistic regression analysis. Linearity of age in the Cox regression model as well as in the logistic regression model was checked as described by Thomsen, with three breakpoints for a piecewise linear age function at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quartiles of the age distribution.27 The proportional hazard assumption for age and sex was checked by drawing the cumulative hazard as a function of time for different age groups and for the sexes.
Age was found to fit the statistical models well as a linear variable. The proportional assumption fitted well for age and sex with respect to long term mortality, reinfarction rate, and mortality after reinfarction.
This study indicates that short and long term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction does not differ between the sexes. Our study describes the prognosis after acute myocardial infarction, reflecting natural history as registration of our patients took place at the beginning of the '80s, when treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Denmark was conservative compared with the present treatment of such patients.28 29 The worse prognosis for women found in later studies may therefore reflect a less vigorous treatment in women.5 We included all patients under 76 years of age with acute myocardial infarction, over a period of 26.5 months from 16 coronary care units throughout Denmark, covering a fifth of the total population. Thus, the study population was homogeneous and representative for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the whole community.25 This is in contrast with other studies with a more heterogeneous population,3 a more elective selection process,2 17 or a single hospital or single city catchment population.11 15 30 31
The proportion of women in our study (24%) was similar to that in other studies.10 15 The fact that women with acute myocardial infarction tend to be older than men3 8 17 is supported by our data. We found that women with acute myocardial infarction are on average four years older than men with acute myocardial infarction. Some investigators suggest that the protecting role of premenopausal oestrogen against ischaemic heart disease explains the later manifestation of acute myocardial infarction in women,32 whereas others regard differences in lifestyle, including smoking habits, to play an important part.33
Several studies have examined prognosis in the total population and found an excess mortality among women.18 19 34 Some corrected for the influence of age afterwards, giving conflicting results with respect to sex as an independent prognostic factor.2 3 8 15 17 30 31 Our data are presented after adjustment for age. Our overall inhospital and long term mortality and reinfarction rate agree well with results from other studies carried out before thrombolysis was common.13 15 35
For both sexes we found no difference in short as well as long term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Short term mortality increased faster with age in men than in women, however, making the relation between age and short term mortality different in the sexes but not with sex as a prognostic factor in itself. This finding may in part explain the conflicting results regarding the influence of sex on short term mortality in some studies.2 5 17
The study by Greenland et al with data from the database of the secondary prevention reinfarction Israeli nifedipine study, which in design resembles ours, found a worse prognosis in women even after correction for higher age.3 Their finding was supported by Tofler et al.2 An important difference from our study, however, is that the patients in those studies were selected from more heterogenous populations than ours,25 thus Tofler et al found that black women particularly had a worse prognosis.2
Our study of over 700 women and over 2300 men shows that women experiencing acute myocardial infarction tend to be older than men and that early mortality, 10 year mortality, reinfarction rate, mortality after reinfarction, or cause of death do not differ between the sexes. In conclusion, this study indicates that sex itself is not an indicator of risk after acute myocardial infarction.
Funding This study was supported by the Danish Heart Foundation, Laurits Peter Christensen and wife Sigrid Christensen Foundation, Wintherthur Borgen Foundation, Captain Lieutenant Harald Jensen and wife Foundation, and MEDA Copenhagen.
Conflict of interest None.