Editorials

Physical activity and health

BMJ 1996; 313 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7050.126 (Published 20 July 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;313:126
  1. Kenneth E Powell,
  2. Michael Pratt
  1. Associate director for science Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
  2. Chief, Physical Activity Branch Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA

    Avoiding the short and miserable life

    “Of all the causes which conspire to render the life of man short and miserable, none have greater influence than the want of proper exercise.”1

    Recent epidemiological and clinical evidence support this observation by the 18th century Scottish physician Dr William Buchan. Studies suggest causal associations between regular physical activity and reduced rates of coronary heart disease, hypertension, non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, colon cancer, anxiety, and depression.2 The most persuasive proof concerns coronary heart disease. People who are regularly active have about half the risk of those who are sedentary.3 4 Unfortunately, in the United States, Britain, and most other developed nations fewer than half of adults are regularly active.5 6 7 An estimated third of deaths from coronary heart disease in the United States (about 160 000 deaths per year) are attributable to insufficient physical activity.8

    In response to the accumulated research and the widespread recognition that physical inactivity is a major public health issue, the United States National Institutes of Health convened a consensus development conference on physical activity and cardiovascular health last December. After two and a half days of scientific presentations and public discussion, a panel of independent scientists, practising physicians, and consumers reaffirmed that physical inactivity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease.9 They noted that “moderate levels of regular physical activity confer significant health benefits” and that cardiac rehabilitation programmes provide appreciable medical and cost benefits.

    The panel recommended that all children and adults should gradually build to 30 minutes of activity of moderate intensity on most, preferably all, days of the week. People who are already that active can achieve greater benefits by increasing either the duration or intensity of activity. The panel purposefully called for “physical activity” rather than “exercise” because most people can incorporate moderate intensity activities into their daily routine.10 The panel noted that 30 minutes can be accumulated through segments of at least 10 minutes' duration. Most adults do not need medical testing before starting regular, moderate intensity activity such as brisk walking or gardening, but men over 40 and women over 50 years of age with multiple cardiovascular risk factors who contemplate a programme of vigorous activity, and people with known cardiovascular disease, should consult a physician.9

    Routine activity patterns are determined by societal and individual factors. The panel noted that medical care providers have a key part to play in informing people about the importance of physical activity, and it recommended that materials be developed to help them. The panel also recommended environmental and policy changes at schools, worksites, and other community sites, such as indoor areas for lunchtime walking; as well as a coordinated national campaign to promote physical activity in the United States.9

    The panel's recommendations concur with recent statements from voluntary, federal, and academic organisations in the United States2 11 and from the Department of Health in Britain.12 However, behind these consensus statements stand two perplexing impediments to widespread and easy promotion of physical activity. One concerns the amount and intensity of activity; the other concerns the difficulty of stimulating a sedentary society to become more active.

    The recommended dose of exercise is an accumulated 30 minutes of moderate intensity activity—such as brisk walking, gardening, cycling, or swimming—on most, preferably all, days of the week.2 9 10 The recommendation, however, may not be specific enough for people interested in enhancing their activity pattern. Will less than the recommended dose provide any benefit? Will vigorous activity provide greater benefits? These details are important to health care providers who may want to know specifically what to recommend, and to members of the public, many of whom want to know how little they can get away with while still reaping the benefits.

    Studies suggest that increasing one's activity reduces the risk of coronary heart disease even if the recommended dose is not achieved. There is no apparent threshold, and each increment further reduces the risk.12 Among people who are already active, vigorous activity probably adds benefit, but how much and at what risk is uncertain. Injuries, and sudden death, may increase more with intensity than volume.13

    Developing a more active society will not be easy. Industrialised society systematically excludes physical activity from our daily lives. Even walking, the simplest and most natural of all activities, can require the commitment of a salmon swimming upstream to spawn. Many American communities have few pavements, no cycle paths, inaccessible stairways, inadequate public transport systems, problems with safety on the streets, and stores, schools, and workplaces that are many miles from homes. All of these factors make staying at home or driving cars more attractive than walking or bicycling.

    Highly individualised messages will be necessary. Despite their inadequate representation in the research literature, nonwhite men and women of all racial and ethnic groups seem to accrue the same relative benefits from activity as white men. However, attitudes and behaviours are significantly influenced by sex, age, weight, marital status, socioeconomic status, retirement status, and other factors. Therefore, promotional efforts will need to be specifically targeted.

    In spite of these and other barriers, a more active population is possible. The gradual decline in cigarette smoking and blood cholesterol values in the United States indicates that widespread behavioural change can be achieved. In addition, researchers are learning more about what makes individuals decide to be more active14 and are refining guidelines to help practitioners shape and target their counselling.15 Finally, people are more likely to stick with an activity they enjoy,16 and activities of moderate and vigorous intensity offer a wider range of enjoyable options than vigorous activity alone. As a result, an active life will be less miserable not only because it is healthier but because the activities are fun.

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    3. 3.
    4. 4.
    5. 5.
    6. 6.
    7. 7.
    8. 8.
    9. 9.
    10. 10.
    11. 11.
    12. 12.
    13. 13.
    14. 14.
    15. 15.
    16. 16.