Neonatal circumcision and penile cancer

BMJ 1996; 313 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7048.46b (Published 6 July 1996)
Cite this as: BMJ 1996;313:46.3

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Evidence that circumcision is protective is overwhelming

  1. Edgar J Schoen
  1. Director Regional Perinatal Screening Program, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, 3900 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94611, USA

    EDITOR,—As chairman of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Task Force on Circumcision1 and a reviewer on the topic for the American Cancer Society,2 I am amazed at the claim by Paul M Fleiss and Frederick Hodges that no link exists between circumcision and penile cancer.3 In an incredible example of selective medical amnesia the authors ignore evidence that has accumulated in the past 64 years. They discredit Wolbarst's study in 1932 without mentioning the data.4 Wolbarst reviewed 1103 cases …

    Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

    Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL