Lessons from international experience in controlling pharmaceutical expenditure. I: influencing patientsBMJ 1996; 312 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7044.1469 (Published 08 June 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;312:1469
- Nick Freemantle, research fellowa,
- Karen Bloor, research fellowb
- a Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO1 5DD
- b Department of Health Sciences and Clinical Evaluation, University of York, York YO1 5DD
- Correspondence to: Ms Bloor.
- Accepted 3 April 1996
This is the first of three papers to review international policies to control spending on drugs and improve the efficiency of drug use. Policies can target three main groups: patients, prescribing doctors, and the drugs industry. In this paper we examine policies aimed at patients, particularly restrictions on reimbursement (such as prescription charges). Rigorous experimental and quasi-experimental studies suggest that policies to limit the level of reimbursement of drugs reduce the use of essential as well as non-essential drugs and may do more harm than good.
Spending on drugs in the British NHS represents over 10% of the total NHS budget and has increased steadily over recent decades.1 2 Similar increases have occurred in health care systems throughout the developed world, and governments have adopted policies to control drug costs that affect both the supply of and demand for drugs. We reviewed recent policy in several developed countries to provide insights for British health policy. We assessed the impact of these policies on prescribing by examining evaluative studies with rigorous designs that we identified through a comprehensive search strategy.
In this paper we examine the impact of policies intended to reduce patient demand for drugs. In future papers we consider policies aimed directly at prescribers and policies intended to regulate the activities of the drugs industry.
Methods of review
Policies to control drug costs and to improve the cost effectiveness of drug use in the developed world are subject to frequent change. We used published descriptive studies and extensive contact with experts in relevant countries to ensure that our review was up to date and that policy initiatives were interpreted correctly. Where necessary, foreign language publications were translated to enable up to date analysis of policy.
In order to assess the impact of such policies in practice, and gaps in knowledge, we …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial