- Chris Dawson,
- Hugh Whitfield
Trauma Renal trauma
Ten per cent of patients with blunt or penetrating injuries of the abdomen have associated renal trauma. Evaluation begins with a history of the mechanism of the injury, which is important for predicting the likely complications. Investigations of likely renal injury must go hand in hand with the investigation of other likely injuries, and vigilance should be maintained at all times.
Investigating patients with suspected renal trauma
Condition
Hypotensive patients needing immediate surgery
Hypotensive patients with microscopic haematuria
Normotensive patients with macroscopic haematuria
All children with haematuria
Investigation
Single shot intravenous urography
Computed tomography (or urography if not available)
Patients admitted with severe abdominal injury and shock will need immediate laparotomy. In these patients one shot intravenous urography should be performed in theatre to confirm that both kidneys are functioning. Patients found to have either frank haematuria or microscopic haematuria and clinical shock should ideally be investigated with contrast enhanced computed tomography, which is better than urography in patients with suspected renal trauma. In patients with blunt trauma and microscopic haematuria but normal blood pressure, the incidence of important injury is small, and imaging is not needed. If microscopic haematuria persists for more than six weeks then intravenous urography and cystoscopy should be performed to exclude a coincidental tumour.
Angiograms showing renal trauma before embolisation (top) and after embolisation (bottom).
A different approach is needed in children, in whom no correlation between degree of haematuria and severity of injury has been found. Some studies have stated that all children presenting after trauma with haematuria (whether microscopic or macroscopic) should be investigated with computed tomography as the likelihood of important renal injury is greater …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012