Scheme has been a disaster

BMJ 1996; 312 doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1304b (Published 18 May 1996)
Cite this as: BMJ 1996;312:1304.3

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Judy A Gilley
  1. Joint deputy chairperson, General Medical Services Committee Cornwall House Surgery, London N3 1LD

    EDITOR,—Stephen Gillam and colleagues' editorial on the recording of health promotion activity arrives at a broadly correct conclusion by a route that ignores the present political context of the discredited banding scheme in general practice.1 General practitioners began to see the need to offer health promotion to their patients during the 1980s, and some exciting developments followed, in the best tradition of general practice. Unfortunately, 1990 saw the introduction of the “10 patients …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL