Letters

Health promotion in primary care

BMJ 1996; 312 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1304a (Published 18 May 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;312:1304

Scheme should be comprehensively reviewed

  1. Hugh Bethell
  1. General practitioner Health Centre, Alton, Hampshire GU34 2QX

    EDITOR,—Stephen Gillam and colleagues are right to question the recent modifications to the health promotion package for general practice.1 I believe, however, that they have failed to identify the changes that could make the scheme worth while.

    The package, which was introduced in 1993, was a curious mishmash of data collection, primary prevention, secondary prevention, and management of chronic …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Subscribe