Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Scheme should be comprehensively reviewed

  1. Hugh Bethell
  1. General practitioner Health Centre, Alton, Hampshire GU34 2QX

    EDITOR,—Stephen Gillam and colleagues are right to question the recent modifications to the health promotion package for general practice.1 I believe, however, that they have failed to identify the changes that could make the scheme worth while.

    The package, which was introduced in 1993, was a curious mishmash of data collection, primary prevention, secondary prevention, and management of chronic …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL