- Attilio Maseri,
- Luigi M Biasucci,
- Giovanna Liuzzo
- Professor of cardiology Lecturer in cardiology Research fellow Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of Rome, Polyclinico A Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy
C Reactive protein concentrations may provide useful information on risk
Recent reports have suggested a link between blood concentrations of C reactive protein and the risk of cardiovascular disease. The ECAT study (European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study) followed 3000 people with chronic stable ischaemic heart disease for three years and found a significant correlation between concentrations of C reactive protein within the normal range and long term cardiovascular risk.1 Raised concentrations have also been shown to be strong prognostic indicators in patients with unstable angina,2 and in this week's BMJ Mendall et al report an association between C reactive protein concentrations and indirect evidence of ischaemic heart disease (p1061).3 What are the pathogenetic implications of this novel marker of acute and chronic manifestations of ischaemic heart disease and its relevance in clinical practice?
Mendall et al studied 303 men aged 50-69 years selected from general practice registers3 and found that the prevalence of indirect evidence of ischaemic heart disease and a history of claudication (together with age, smoking, chronic bronchitis, and most traditional cardiovascular risk factors) increased progressively as blood concentrations of C reactive protein rose. This correlation between C reactive protein and traditional risk factors for ischaemic heart disease may influence prognosis in the long term by favouring the development of atherosclerosis, but the prognostic value of C reactive protein might also result from an increased incidence and worse outcome of …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012