Editorials Time to face up to research misconduct BMJ 1996; 312 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7034.789 (Published 30 March 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;312:789 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Letter Profession must police itself Published: 13 July 1996; BMJ 313 doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7049.109a See more Trump chooses Obamacare opponent to lead Health and Human Services BMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i6469; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6469 Drug firms need to tackle affordability BMJ November 14, 2016, 355 i6096; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6096 World Medical Association’s tainted president, Ketan Desai BMJ November 10, 2016, 355 i5867; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5867 Cancer drugs, survival, and ethics BMJ November 09, 2016, 355 i5792; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5792 WHO refers $29m Oxford research project to GMC for misconduct BMJ November 07, 2016, 355 i5971; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5971 Cited by... What are local issues? The problem of the local review of researchAbstract Fulltext PDF Research misconduct and redundant publicationAbstract Fulltext PDF Medicine needs its MI5Abstract Fulltext PDF Misconduct in research: editors respondAbstract Fulltext PDF AuthorshipAbstract Fulltext PDF Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg codeAbstract Fulltext PDF Patients' consent should have been soughtAbstract Fulltext PDF Profession must police itselfAbstract Fulltext PDF Misconduct in researchAbstract Fulltext PDF Medical Research Council is setting up rigorous proceduresAbstract Fulltext PDF