Papers Health care rationing: the public's debate BMJ 1996; 312 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7032.670 (Published 16 March 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;312:670 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Letter Rationing in the NHS Published: 22 June 1996; BMJ 312 doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1605 Cited by... Priority Setting of Ventilators in the COVID-19 Pandemic from the publics perspectiveAbstract Fulltext PDF Real-Time Rationing of Scarce Resources: The Northeast Proton Therapy Center ExperienceAbstract Fulltext PDF Equity in access to exercise tolerance testing, coronary angiography, and coronary artery bypass grafting by age, sex and clinical indicationsAbstract Fulltext PDF Priority setting in health careAbstract Fulltext PDF Consulting the public about the NHSAbstract Fulltext PDF Evaluation of outreach clinics held by specialists in general practice in EnglandAbstract Fulltext PDF Ageism in cardiologyAbstract Fulltext PDF Waiting times and prioritisation for coronary artery bypass surgery in New ZealandAbstract Fulltext PDF Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group studyAbstract Fulltext PDF Who should decide? Qualitative analysis of panel data from public, patients, healthcare professionals, and insurers on priorities in health careAbstract Fulltext PDF The case againstAbstract Fulltext PDF Rationing health careAbstract Fulltext PDF Commentary: Reach beyond metaphor to assess valueAbstract Fulltext PDF Rationing health care: moving the debate forwardAbstract Fulltext PDF Rationing in the NHSAbstract Fulltext PDF Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?Abstract Fulltext PDF