Case management: a dubious practiceBMJ 1996; 312 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7030.523 (Published 02 March 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;312:523
- Max Marshall
- Senior lecturer in community psychiatry University of Manchester, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire PR2 9HT
Underevaluated and ineffective, but now government policy
American psychiatrists visiting Britain will experience a sense of deja vu when they encounter the recent clutch of community care “initiatives.” They will soon spot that “care management” and the “care programme approach” are no more than a rehash of “case management,” an old American idea. From politeness they will probably refrain from telling their hosts that there is little reason to believe that case management works.
Case management arose in the United States in response to the dispersal of psychiatric and social care that followed the closure of large mental hospitals. The basic idea was that a designated person, the “case manager,” would take special responsibility for a “client” in the community. The case manager would assess the client's needs and ensure, through a care plan, that suitable services were provided to meet them. The case manager would also monitor the provision of these services and maintain contact with the client.1
From the beginning the literature on “case management” has been bedevilled by a tendency to …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial