- Mark Davenport
Principles of diagnosis
A child with acute abdominal pain can be a disconcerting experience for most doctors, and there is often little in the way of aids or investigations that can be used to arrive at a correct diagnosis. Certainly there are common conditions that cause problems in most age groups (such as appendicitis) and others that are usually confined to a specific age group (such as intussusception).
Abdominal pain is common, with most children never seeing a doctor, and, of those that do, most being seen and treated at home by a general practitioner. Of those that are taken to hospital, some recover without obvious sequelae despite the lack of a specific diagnosis. The label non-specific abdominal pain has been used for these cases, and this, in truth, will be the commonest “cause” of most acute abdominal pain that most clinicians will see.
Diagnostic breakdown of one year's admissions for abdominal pain in a district general hospital (after Jones1).
Clinical approach
An accurate history is vital, although in younger children it is usually hearsay. Important points are the length of the current illness; previous similar episodes; periodicity if it is a colicky pain; whether it is constant, worsening, or getting better; and any related or aggravating factors. Gastrointestinal upset (such as vomiting) is common and can be a non-specific feature. The presence of bile in vomit is an important discriminant suggesting intestinal obstruction. Alternatively, substantial diarrhoea can accompany surgical pathology and should not be accepted simply as enteritis. Urinary symptoms such as dysuria and frequency can be difficult to establish in young children and again can also be entirely erroneous—both are common in a child with a pelvic appendicitis.
Symptoms associated with surgically correctable causes of acute abdominal pain
Vomiting of bile
Asymmetric pain
Local tenderness
Peritonism
Examination
The examiner needs to have a patient, gentle technique, not only with the child, but …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Emergency admissions for diabetes fall by almost 7% in integrated care pilot scheme
Published 24 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 24 May 2012
Re: The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties
Published 24 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 24 May 2012
Reply to Anne Szarewski and Diana Mansour
Published 24 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (8 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27