Declining sperm counts

BMJ 1996; 312 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7029.457 (Published 24 February 1996)
Cite this as: BMJ 1996;312:457

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. D M de Kretser
  1. Director Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia

    Environmental chemicals may be to blame

    The controversy over whether sperm counts have declined over the past 50 years is reopened by two papers in this issue of the BMJ. In a carefully analysed study of cohorts of unselected men in Britain born between 1951 and 1973, Irvine and colleagues demonstrate a progressive decline in sperm concentration and total sperm number per ejaculate of about 2% a year over 11 years.1 A smaller study by Bujan et al finds no change in sperm counts of sperm donors in the Toulouse area of France over a 16 year period.2

    The controversy over sperm counts began with a metaanalysis by Carlsen et al which showed a decline in a sperm concentrations from 113 x 106/ml to 66 x 106/ml between 1940 and 1990.3 These findings were supported by Auger et al in a study of 1351 fertile men in Paris.4 …

    Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

    Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL