- Gregory Y H Lip,
- Robert D S Watson
During atrial fibrillation the atrial impulses discharge at a rate of 350-600 per minute, resulting in small (or “fine”), irregular f (fibrillation) waves. The amplitude of these waves varies and may be especially prominent (or “coarse”) in lead V1. As only occasional impulses penetrate the atrioventricular node, a totally irregular ventricular rhythm results, which is the characteristic of this arrhythmia.
Electrocardiogram showing atrial fibrillation with “fine” f waves.
Rapid atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response may easily be mistaken for other supraventricular arrhythmias—for example, atrial flutter or supraventricular tachycardias. Variation in the RR interval is the important clue. At very high heart rates, with a short RR interval, beat to beat variation may be subtle but may become more obvious if the carotid sinus is massaged or the speed of the electrocardiogram trace increased. In a young patient with fast atrial fibrillation it is important to consider an underlying pre-excitation syndrome, such as the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, as traditional drugs such as digoxin or verapamil will accelerate the ventricular response by blocking atrioventricular node impulses and increasing conduction through the accessory pathway.
Atrial fibrillation with “coarse” f waves (and ventricular ectopic)
Finally, atrial fibrillation with a bundle branch block pattern on the QRS complex may be difficult to distinguish from a ventricular tachycardia: again, the important difference is the irregularity of the RR interval present in atrial fibrillation.
Fast atrial fibrillation (lead V1).
Atrial fibrillation with bundle branch block pattern (lead V1).
Atrial extrasystoles
Atrial extrasystoles occur commonly and may account for an irregular pulse, leading to atrial fibrillation being wrongly diagnosed. Long pauses may follow as sinus node automaticity is depressed by the extrasystole. Multifocal extrasystoles are particularly common in pulmonary disease.
Sinus rhythm with multiple …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012