Intended for healthcare professionals

Papers

Prospective observational study to assess value of prostate specific antigen as screening test for prostate cancer

BMJ 1995; 311 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7016.1340 (Published 18 November 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;311:1340
  1. Carol Parkes, lecturera,
  2. Nicholas J Wald, professora,
  3. Philip Murphy, computer programmera,
  4. Lynne George, laboratory research coordinatora,
  5. Hilary C Watt, statisticiana,
  6. Roger Kirby, consultant urologistb,
  7. Paul Knekt, laboratory directorc,
  8. K J Helzlsouer, associate professord,
  9. J Tuomilehto, research professore
  1. Cancer Research Campaign Cancer Screening Group, Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Medical College of St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1M 6BQ
  2. Department of Urology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE
  3. Department of Health and Disability, National Public Health Institute and Social Insurance Institution, Research and Development Unit, Helsinki, Finland
  4. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Training Center for Public Health Research, Washington County Health Department, MD 21742-2067, United States
  5. Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland
  1. aCorrespondence to: Professor Wald.
  • Accepted 20 August 1995

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate measurement of serum prostate specific antigen as a potential screening test for future clinical prostate cancer among healthy men.

Design: Nested case-control study with stored serum samples collected from 49261 men with follow up using national death and cancer registration systems.

Subjects: 265 asymptomatic men who subsequently developed clinical prostate cancer and 1055 controls matched for age, study centre, and duration of storage of samples.

Main outcome measures: Distribution of concentrations of the antigen in men who developed prostate cancer and in controls.

Results: Prostate specific antigen concentrations were significantly higher in men who subsequently developed prostate cancer than in controls. In the first three years after blood collection the median concentration was 23 times greater in cases than in controls of the same age at the same centre (that is, 23 multiples of the median). A smaller difference persisted thereafter; 4.0 multiples of the median 3-6 years after blood collection, 3.6 6-10 years, and 1.8 after 10 years. In the first three years the proportion of men who developed prostate cancer and had raised levels of the antigen (>/=12 multiples of the median) (detection rate or sensitivity) was 81% (95% confidence interval 54% to 96%). The proportion of men who did not develop prostate cancer but had levels this high (false positive rate) was only 0.5%.

Conclusion: Prostate specific antigen measurement is a highly discriminatory screening test for prostate cancer among healthy men. In the general population, 60-74 year old men who had >/=12 times the normal median level would have about a 50% chance of developing clinical prostate cancer in the next three years. Measurement of this antigen is a good enough screening test to justify a randomised controlled trial to determine any reduction in mortality from prostate cancer.

Footnotes

  • Funding Cancer Research Campaign; BUPA Medical Research and Development Ltd.

  • Conflict of interest None.

  • Accepted 20 August 1995
View Full Text