Editorials Evaluating new surgical procedures BMJ 1995; 311 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7015.1243 (Published 11 November 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;311:1243 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles No related articles found. See more Government recognises contribution of EU workers to the NHS, says health minister BMJ March 20, 2017, 356 j1404; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1404 Dyspnoea after home improvement work BMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i5957; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5957 Abdominal pain after colonoscopy BMJ November 10, 2016, 355 i5505; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5505 Senior surgeon suspended for failing to spot indicators of severity BMJ November 01, 2016, 355 i5902; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5902 Medical director of Cornwall trust is first to be struck off for management failings BMJ October 24, 2016, 355 i5712; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5712 Cited by... The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgeryAbstract Fulltext PDF More randomised controlled studies in speech and language therapyAbstract Fulltext PDF Do patients with osteoarthritis get the clinical research they need?Abstract Fulltext PDF Trials and fast changing technologies: the case for tracker studiesAbstract Fulltext PDF Unbiased, relevant, and reliable assessments in health careAbstract Fulltext PDF Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important?Abstract Fulltext PDF Design of trials should depend on whether new skills are requiredAbstract Fulltext PDF Evaluating new surgical proceduresAbstract Fulltext PDF Few trials of laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been randomisedAbstract Fulltext PDF