About half of the three million women in Britain who use the combined oral contraceptive pill were advised by the Committee on Safety of Medicines last week to switch to another brand, amid controversy about the way in which the new information was released. Evidence suggesting that use of two of the newer “third generation progestogens”--gestodene and desogestrel--is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism was presented to the committee two weeks ago. As a result it decided to recommend that all users of brands containing the newer progestogens--Femodene, Femodene ED, Minulet, Triadene, Tri-Minulet, Marvelon, and Mercilon--should be offered the choice of switching to another brand and that these brands should be contraindicated in women who have other risk factors for venous thromboembolism.
Presenting the committee's decision at a press conference last Thursday, its chairman, Professor Michael Rawlins, said that early results from the World Health Organisation's task force on epidemiological research in reproductive health had suggested a possible association between the newer brands of the combined pill in July. The results prompted the committee to ask …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Emergency admissions for diabetes fall by almost 7% in integrated care pilot scheme
Published 24 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 24 May 2012
Re: The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties
Published 24 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 24 May 2012
Reply to Anne Szarewski and Diana Mansour
Published 24 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (8 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27