- T W Meade, directora,
- Sandra Dyer, statisticiana,
- Wendy Browne, research nursea,
- A O Frank, consultant in rheumatology and rehabilitationb
- aMedical Research Council Epidemiology and Medical Care Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Medical College of St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1M 6BQ
- bNorthwick Park Hospital, Harrow HA1 3UJ
- Correspondence to: Professor Meade.
- Accepted 5 August 1995
Abstract
Objective : To compare the effectiveness over three years of chiropractic and hospital outpatient management for low back pain.
Design : Randomised allocation of patients to chiropractic or hospital outpatient management.
Setting : Chiropractic clinics and hospital outpatient departments within reasonable travelling distance of each other in 11 centres.
Subjects : 741 men and women aged 18-64 years with low back pain in whom manipulation was not contraindicated.
Outcome measures : Change in total Oswestry questionnaire score and in score for pain and patient satisfaction with allocated treatment.
Results : According to total Oswestry scores improvement in all patients at three years was about 29% more in those treated by chiropractors than in those treated by the hospitals. The beneficial effect of chiropractic on pain was particularly clear. Those treated by chiropractors had more further treatments for back pain after the completion of trial treatment. Among both those initially referred from chiropractors and from hospitals more rated chiropractic helpful at three years than hospital management.
Conclusions : At three years the results confirm the findings of an earlier report that when chiropractic or hospital therapists treat patients with low back pain as they would in day to day practice those treated by chiropractic derive more benefit and long term satisfaction than those treated by hospitals.
Footnotes
-
Funding Medical Research Council, the National Back Pain Association, the European Chiropractors Union, and the King Edward's Hospital Fund for London.
-
Conflict of interest None.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: The rise of the pop psychologists
Published 22 May 2012
Re: Health, employment, and economic change, 1973-2009: repeated cross sectional study
Published 22 May 2012
Re: Pfizer Australia faces scrutiny over atorvastatin advertising campaign
Published 22 May 2012
Re: Medicine is our vocation
Published 22 May 2012
Love of Life
Published 22 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (6 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (6 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32