Open access to specialist opinion is preferable
BMJ 1995; 311 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.326b (Published 29 July 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;311:326- Laurence O'Toole,
- Andrew Oates,
- Kevin S Channer
- Research registrar Senior registrar Consultant cardiologist Department of Cardiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF
EDITOR,--C M Francis and colleague's report on open access echocardiography1 highlights the fears of many cardiologists about open access services.2 The principal aim of the author's service—the identification of patients with left ventricular dysfunction so that treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor could be started—occurred in only 50 (19%) of 259 patients, while valve disease was identified in 12. In a similar study of an open access exercise electrocardiography service McClements et al identified ischaemic heart disease in only 18% of the 192 patients tested.3 It is argued that a negative result of the test is reassuring, but many patients remain symptomatic despite reassurance.4 Furthermore, screening a low risk population …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.