- Rosalind Ramsay, senior registrar in psychiatrya,
- Tom Fahy, consultant psychiatrista
- aBethlem Royal and Maudsley NHS Trust, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AZ
- Correspondence to: Dr Ramsay.
- Accepted 13 April 1995
Psychiatric illness stands out as having a rich multifactorial aetiology. This makes it unreasonable to expect massive advances because of the complexity of studies needed to understand it. Acknowledging the multifactorial nature of psychiatric illness, over the past year researchers have tried to consolidate information about different disorders—for example, by studying environmental aspects of the more biological conditions and biological aspects of the traditionally more environmental disorders—and in drawing up treatment protocols. Schizophrenia There have been some promising developments in the treatment of schizophrenia, with both pharmacological and psychological interventions. It is now recognised that the atypical neuroleptic drug clozapine is effective in 30-60% of patients with schizophrenia who do not respond to conventional neuroleptics.1 2 As up to 2% of patients treated with clozapine develop agranulocytosis, obligatory blood monitoring has been introduced, which can be a considerable obstacle to compliance for many chronically psychotic patients. The introduction of clozapine in Britain in 1990 was followed by the release of another atypical neuroleptic, risperidone, in 1993. The clinical effects of these drugs have stimulated investigations into the neurochemistry of schizophrenia and are leading to the formulation and testing of different hypotheses to explain the disorder's complex phenomenology. Conventional neuroleptics are presumed to exert their effect through blockade of dopamine D2 receptors. Clozapine has a more complex pharmacology, with a lower occupancy of D2 receptors and higher occupancy of D1 receptors than conventional neuroleptics,3 4 in addition to potent blockade of 5HT2 receptors. The finding that clozapine also selectively binds to the D4 receptor led to speculation about the role of this receptor in the aetiology of schizophrenia. There is, however, no difference between patients who respond to clozapine and those who do not respond in the distribution of alleles for the D4 gene,5 which suggests that clozapine's …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012