Author's replyBMJ 1995; 310 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1602 (Published 17 June 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:1602
- Philip Steer
- Professor Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH
EDITOR,—To answer the questions of Sarah Vause and colleagues in reverse order, I can reassure them that the data given in our paper referred only to singleton pregnancies. This information was included in our original submission but was inadvertently omitted when we revised the paper to answer points made by referees. I am grateful for the chance to put the record straight. …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial