Medicine And Books Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology BMJ 1995; 310 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6992.1476 (Published 03 June 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:1476 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles No related articles found. See more Hunger striking prisoners: the doctors' dilemma BMJ October 13, 2005, 331 (7521) 913; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7521.913 Has the President's Council on Bioethics missed the boat? BMJ September 11, 2003, 327 (7415) 629; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7415.629 Vaccination against mumps, measles, and rubella: is there a case for deepening the debate?How safe is MMR vaccine?Validity of the evidenceDealing with uncertaintyGP's response BMJ October 13, 2001, 323 (7317) 838-840; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7317.838 The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasiaAre we treading a fine line?Paralysing agents may be given up to but not at or beyond the point of extubationThe parents' perspective on withdrawing treatmentThe doctrine of double effect is difficult but not impossible to apply BMJ August 18, 2001, 323 (7309) 388-391; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7309.388 Results of genetic testing: when confidentiality conflicts with a duty to warn relativesCase studyAct to resolve conflictView from Dutch general practiceFamily duty is more important than rights BMJ December 09, 2000, 321 (7274) 1464-1466; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7274.1464
