- Ronald E LaPorte, professor (rlaporte@vms.cis.pitt.edu)a,
- Eric Marler, independent consultantb,
- Shunichi Akazawa, information specialistc,
- Francois Sauer, managing partnerd,
- Carlos Gamboa, regional advisere,
- Chris Shenton, internet engineerf,
- Caryle Glosser, psychologistg,
- Anthony Villasenor, managerh,
- Malcolm Maclure, associate professori
- a Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, 3460 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
- b Tarrytown, NY, USA
- c Geneva, Switzerland
- d AT (GIS), Group of Enterprise, Design and Development, Boca Raton, FL 33434, USA
- e Pan American Health Organisation, Washington, DC, USA
- f Sterling Software, Washington, DC, USA
- g Pittsburgh, PA
- h NASA Scientific Internet, Washington, DC
- i Department of Epidemiology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Correspondence to: Dr LaPorte
The musky scent of aging paper in our medical libraries still evokes an atmosphere of scholarship. But the cloistered peace of the stacks is increasingly punctured by the faint sounds of the coming revolution: the clicks, beeps, and whirrs of computers linked to the internet. For whom do they toll? Are they the death knell of biomedical journals as we know them? Or are they the pealing spire of the global village summoning health scientists to the electronic commons to share the harvest of knowledge?
We are at a watershed in biomedical publishing. For some time the costs of paper journals have been mounting and the budgets of health science libraries contracting, while the number of have nots in poorer countries clamouring for access to medical literature has been growing.1 But now the information technology explosion that revolutionised banking and the airline industry is at the gateway of the biomedical community.
As the hard copy journal system has started to decay, there has been an information technology explosion that, some argue, will completely transform the exchange of information in the biomedical community. The current process of biomedical publication expanded in the late 1800s. The approaches towards delivery of information to the scientists have changed little during the 20th century: mailed journals, textbooks, and scientific meetings. Transmitting information through the journal system can be likened to the use of the Addressograph in the 1950s for producing mass mailings, or the vinyl records that we all remember. New technology came in to produce the mailings more effectively and to “deliver” music to the consumers. Within a short period the Addressograph and the record player became virtually extinct. We believe that biomedical journals as we know them will become extinct in the next few years as the result of the development and …
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012