Letters

Academic integrity

BMJ 1995; 310 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6986.1068c (Published 22 April 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:1068

This article has a correction. Please see:

Proper review makes funding irrelevant

  1. James Bird
  1. Consultant physician St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY

    EDITOR,—In writing on academic integrity Richard Smith discusses conflicts of interest and suggests that authors of papers in scientific journals should state their source of funding on the basis that any bias in their work may thereby be made apparent to readers.1 This seems to be logically inconsistent. Editors of journals have the responsibility to ensure that material that is published is soundly based, conducted, and interpreted; if it is, then …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe