Should herbal medicine-like products be licensed as medicines

BMJ 1995; 310 doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6986.1023 (Published 22 April 1995)
Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:1023

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Peter A G M De Smet
  1. Clinical pharmacologist Drug Information Centre, Royal Dutch Association for the Advancement of Pharmacy, 2514 JL The Hague, Netherlands

    Special licensing seems the best way forward

    Herbal remedies form a potpourri that ranges from plants that people collect themselves and then take for health reasons to approved medicinal products. Many herbal products available in Britain fall between the far ends of this regulatory range: unlicensed preparations are thought to account for over 80% of herbal sales.1 European Union legislation requires herbal products to be authorised for marketing if they are industrially produced2 and if their presentation or their function, or both, bring them inside its definition of a medicinal product.3 Unfortunately, the drawing of sharp borderlines is difficult.

    Many medicine-like products on the British herbal market remain unregistered for two reasons: acceptable data on efficacy, safety, and quality may not be available, and the licensing fee is high. Diluting requirements for registration would introduce double standards, which would be highly controversial. On the one hand, a single regimen for medicinal products offers undeniable advantages including equal treatment for all kinds of remedies and …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL