Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia: association with education. The Rotterdam studyBMJ 1995; 310 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6985.970 (Published 15 April 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:970
- Alewijn Ott, research physiciana,
- Monique M B Bretelera, assistant professor of epidemiology,
- Frans van Harskamp, neurologista,
- Jules J Claus, resident in neurologya,
- Tischa J M van der Cammen, consultant geriatriciana,
- Diederick E Grobbee, professor of clinical epidemiologya,
- Albert Hofman, professor of epidemiologya
- Correspondence to: Dr A Ott, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical School, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.
- Accepted 17 February 1995
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of dementia and its subtypes in the general population and examine the relation of the disease to education.
Design: Population based cross sectional study.
Setting: Ommoord, a suburb of Rotterdam.
Subjects: 7528 participants of the Rotterdam study aged 55-106 years.
Results: 474 cases of dementia were detected, giving an overall prevalence of 6.3%. Prevalence ranged from 0.4% (5/1181 subjects) at age 55-59 years to 43.2% (19/44) at 95 years and over. Alzheimer's disease was the main subdiagnosis (339 cases; 72%); it was also the main cause of the pronounced increase in dementia with age. The relative proportion of vascular dementia (76 cases; 16%), Parkinson's disease dementia (30; 6%), and other dementias (24; 5%) decreased with age. A substantially higher prevalence of dementia was found in subjects with a low level of education. The association with education was not due to confounding by cardiovascular disease.
Conclusions: The prevalence of dementia increases exponentially with age. About one third of the population aged 85 and over has dementia. Three quarters of all dementia is due to Alzheimer's disease. In this study an inverse dose-response relation was found between education and dementia—in particular, Alzheimer's disease.
Of all cases of dementia, 72% were cases of Alzheimer's disease
The pronounced increase in prevalence of dementia with age was due to a substantial increase in Alzheimer's disease
Alzheimer's disease was more often diagnosed in less educated people
The association between dementia and education could not be explained by cardiovascular disease comorbidity
In many populations the proportion of elderly people is growing steadily. Owing to shifts in the population pyramid and increased life expectancy the number of people aged 75 and over in the Netherlands has increased by 65% in the past 20 years.1 Similar increases have occurred in other countries and will have a major impact on future health care costs.2 Dementing disorders are common in elderly and, especially, very old people.3 Studies of their prevalence rates and determinants are of medical and social importance.
We studied the prevalence of dementia and its subtypes among 7528 subjects in the population based Rotterdam study with special reference to its association with level of education.
Population and methods
The Rotterdam study is a prospective population based study of several important groups of diseases of old age4 5—namely, neurological, cardiovascular, locomotor, and ophthalmological. Between 1990 and 1993 all participants were subjected to detailed interview and examination in order to collect baseline data and ascertain their health status. In a substudy the prevalence of dementia was assessed by a three phase approach. Firstly, all participants were screened with a brief cognitive test. Screen positive subjects then underwent additional testing, and those whose results suggested a possibility of dementia were either subjected to detailed examination or had their medical records used to confirm the diagnosis and establish the type of dementia.
All residents of the Rotterdam suburb of Ommoord aged 55 and over (including those living in institutions) were invited to participate in the Rotterdam study. Of the 10275 eligible subjects, 7983 (78%) accepted. Of the eligible subjects, 7528 (73%) were screened for cognition in the dementia study, the remaining subjects being lost through death or refusal.
The brief cognitive test for dementia comprised a combined minimental state examination6 and geriatric mental state schedule (GMS-A, organic level).7 The test was administered by trained research assistants. Screen positive subjects had a minimental state examination score of 25 or less or a geriatric mental state score of 1 or more. Screen positive subjects were subsequently examined by a physician with the CAMDEX (Cambridge examination for mental disorders of the elderly) diagnostic interview,8 which included an interview with an informant. Participants who scored less than 80 on the CAMDEX cognitive test or who had higher scores but were suspected of dementia clinically were asked to participate in a third, extensive examination. In this diagnostic phase they were examined by a neurologist, had a brain scan (by magnetic resonance imaging), and were tested by a neuropsychologist.
Of the screen positive subjects, 92% underwent the CAMDEX diagnostic interview. Many subjects with dementia were resident in six homes for elderly people, which were included in the study. These homes had psychogeriatric departments. Often the subjects were already known to be demented. In these subjects and the 8% of screen positive subjects who refused the CAMDEX diagnostic interview or could not be examined diagnostic information was obtained from the general practitioner, physicians in the homes, neurologists, or the Rotterdam Regional Institute for Ambulatory Mental Health Care.
During the initial interview the attained level of education was assessed according to the standard classification of education,9 comparable to the international standard classification of education (Unesco, Paris, 1976). In the standard classification of education seven levels are recognised. In our analysis we combined the four highest levels into one category, thus obtaining four levels: (1) primary education (which applied to 26% of participants); (2) low level vocational training (20%); (3) medium level secondary education (15%); (4) medium level vocational training to university level (39%).
Three indicators of cardiovascular disease (stroke, myocardial infarction, and peripheral atherosclerotic disease), as detailed elsewhere,10 were examined as possible confounders in the relation between education and dementia. A history of stroke was determined by inteview or informant interview in dementia patients. Confirmation of the stroke by a treating physician was required. A previous myocardial infarction was assessed from an electrocardiogram. Suspected abnormalities according to preset criteria were all reviewed by a cardiologist. The presence of peripheral atherosclerotic disease was assumed if the ankle-arm index (ratio between tibial and brachial systolic blood pressure, measured supine) was <0.9 on one side.
DIAGNOSIS OF DEMENTIA
Dementia was diagnosed according to the American Psychiatric Association's criteria (DSM-III-R).11 The subdiagnosis of Alzheimer's disease was based on criteria produced by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association.12 Both possible and probable cases of Alzheimer's disease were grouped in this category. For the subdiagnosis of vascular dementia the DSM-III-R definition of multi-infarct dementia was used.
The dementia type at the onset of the disease was ascertained. Some patients with Alzheimer's disease develop symptoms of vascular dementia in the course of the disease, usually after a stroke, which may result in a sudden worsening of dementia.13 We classified these patients as Alzheimer type with cerebrovascular disease. Parkinson's disease dementia was diagnosed when the dementia started after the onset of idiopathic parkinsonism. The three most important other dementias were alcohol related dementia, tumour related dementia, and dementia associated with normal pressure hydrocephalus. In five patients insufficient information was available to make a subdiagnosis.
On the basis of the clinical dementia rating scale14 and the minimental state examination score a division was made between severe impairment (clinical dementia rating scale over 2 or minimental state examination score under 16, referred to below as severe dementia) and mild to moderate impairment. In the overall prevalence figures all dementia cases, from mild to severe, were included.
The prevalence of dementia and its subtypes was calculated as the percentage of dementia by sex and five year age groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse the association between educational status and dementia. The odds ratio as estimated from the logistic model was used as our measure of association and referred to as relative risk. With dementia or one of the subtypes of dementia as outcome variable we compared the levels of education adjusted for age (numerical variable) and sex. The highest educational level (category 4) was used as reference. The trend in the relative risk for dementia by education was tested with level of education as a linear trend variable in the logistic regression analysis.
By adding stroke, myocardial infarction, or peripheral atherosclerotic disease as covariates in the logistic regression model we checked if these cardiovascular indicators caused substantial changes in the relative risks associated with the various levels of education.
Table I shows the numbers of participants in the dementia study together with their age distribution and the proportion resident in institutions. Of the 7528 study participants, 474 (6.3%) were demented—3.8% (112/2939) of men, 7.9% (362/4589) of women. Age and sex specific prevalences of dementia are shown in table II and Figure 1. With the exception of the age category 80-89 years there were no major differences in prevalence between men and women. At ages 80-89 years women had a higher prevalence of dementia than men. About one third of all demented people had severe dementia; this applied to both men and women.
Prevalences of Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease dementia, and other dementias are shown in Figure 2. Overall, 72% of the dementias were of Alzheimer type, 16% were vascular dementia, 6% were Parkinson's disease dementia, and 5% were other dementias. Table III shows the sex specific prevalences and numbers of cases of the types of dementia in 10 year age groups. There were no substantial differences between men and women in the proportions of dementia types.
The relative risks of dementia (adjusted for age and sex) decreased with increasing educational status (fig 3). Among people with the two lowest levels of education significantly more dementia was diagnosed than among those with the highest level of education (relative risks 3.2 (95% confidence interval 2.2 to 4.6) and 2.0 (1.3 to 3.2) respectively). Similarly for Alzheimer's disease the two lowest educational levels were associated with increased relative risks (4.0 (2.5 to 6.2) and 2.3 (1.3 to 4.1) respectively). For vascular dementia, only the least educated were at significantly increased risk (2.1 (1.0 to 4.5)). Other dementias, including Parkinson's disease dementia, were not significantly associated with education. The trend of a higher prevalence of dementia with less education was highly significant (P<0.0001). Similar trends were observed for Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia (P<0.0001 and P=0.01, respectively).
Adding one or a combination of the indicators of cardiovascular disease did not decrease the inverse relation between educational status and dementia, suggesting that the presence of cardiovascular disease did not explain the association between dementia and education.
We have presented detailed age specific prevalences of dementia and dementia subtypes that indicate Alzheimer's disease as the main contribution to the exponential increase of dementia with age. Our data also show a consistent trend of a higher risk of dementia with lower educational level. This effect of educational status could not be explained by a confounding effect of cardiovascular disease.
All recent population based studies on the prevalence of dementia with standardised diagnostic criteria show an exponential increase with age and a predominance of Alzheimer's disease as the cause of the dementia. However, age specific prevalences vary considerably between studies. This may be due to study design, population sampling methods, or real geographical variations.
Our study is the largest European study of its kind, allowing more precise estimates of prevalence. Compared with a pooled reanalysis of 12 European studies,3 our study showed slightly lower prevalences below the age of 75 and slightly higher prevalences above age 80. Differences in screening and the type of population were the most likely causes. A high sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic procedure was ensured by the three phase comprehensive diagnostic work up.15
A major concern in prevalence studies is nonparticipation. The Rotterdam study, of which the dementia study was only a part, had a fairly high participation rate (almost 80%). However, the non-response may have been selective. If non-response distorted the study results it probably produced an underestimate of the prevalence of dementia. We consider it unlikely that non-response influenced the proportions of dementia.
Without confirmation at necropsy, subtyping dementia remains uncertain. Also the current diagnostic criteria that we used are of limited accuracy, which complicates all large population based dementia studies and which we could not improve even by basing the subdiagnoses on a great number of reliable data. Alzheimer's disease was the main contributor to the steep increase in dementia prevalence with age. We observed only a little increase with age in vascular dementia and even less in Parkinson's disease dementia and other dementias. We classified primary Alzheimer's disease complicated by cerebrovascular disease as Alzheimer's disease. This may be why we found a somewhat higher prevalence of Alzheimer's disease than reported in other European studies.16
In common with other studies, we found a higher prevalence of dementia in groups with less education.17 18 19 20 21 It has been suggested that the education effect could be due to diagnostic bias. There is, indeed, a possibility that early dementia might be missed in a highly educated person, though we do not think that this occurred often in our series because the combined minimental state examination and geriatric mental state schedule is a very sensitive screening test.15 That the education effect also applied to vascular dementia led us to consider whether the association of education with dementia might be due to confounding by cardiovascular disease. This is possible, as cardiovascular disease is associated with both education and dementia. Particularly vascular dementia—but also Alzheimer's disease—is correlated with cardiovascular disease,13 22 23 and cardiovascular disease is more prevalent in people with less education.24 25 However, control for possible confounding by cardiovascular disease did not substantially decrease the magnitude of the association of education with dementia, nor with the subtypes of dementia.
In conclusion, this large population based study suggests that the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease increases with age and that dementia—particularly Alzheimer's disease—is inversely related to educational status.
We are grateful to staff of the Rotterdam study centre for help in data collection, Caroline van Rossum for providing the encoded educational levels, and Inge de Koning for neurophysiological testing. We also acknowledge the collaboration with the general practitioners in Ommoord and the RIAGG (Rotterdam Regional Institute for Ambulatory Mental Health Care) Noord Rotterdam. This study was made possible by financial support from the NESTOR stimulation programme for geriatric research in the Netherlands (Ministry of Health and Ministry of Education), the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Reseach (NWO), the Netherlands Praeventionfund, and the municipality of Rotterdam.