Assessing the consequences of changing childbirth

BMJ 1995; 310 doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.144 (Published 21 January 1995)
Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:144

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. James Owen Drife
  1. Professor of obstetrics and gynaecology General Infirmary, Leeds LS2 9NS

    Better data are needed

    Pregnancy care in Britain is changing,1 and the results of these changes need to be monitored. At first sight this seems easy. Obstetricians and midwives have always led the way in clinical audit. The confidential enquiry into maternal deaths was established over 40 years ago,2 and perinatal mortality is carefully reviewed locally.3 In research, perinatal medicine stands out from other specialties in its systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.4 5

    Nevertheless, standards of audit and data collection are falling, not rising. In the most recent report on maternal deaths6 medical information was missing in 4% of cases, compared with 0.4% in the previous report. The maternity hospital inpatient inquiry has been replaced by a hospital episode system, which is notoriously incomplete, and we now lack reliable figures for such basic …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL