Editorials

Perinatal and infant postmortem examination

BMJ 1995; 310 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6973.141 (Published 21 January 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:141
  1. Malcolm Chiswick
  1. Professor in child health and paediatrics Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester M13 OJH

    Difficult to ask for but potentially valuable

    The relatively large concentration of deaths in the perinatal period and infancy and the need to provide explanations for parents might suggest that clinicians frequently turn to pathologists for information from postmortem examinations. Yet Cartlidge and colleagues in this week's BMJ draw attention to the fact that the rate of postmortem examination for perinatal and infant deaths in Wales is only 58% (p 155).1Their results are probably typical of the rest of Britain. For example, the confidential inquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy in the North Western region found a similarly low rate of only 53% in 1993 (A J Barson and J A Sands, personal communication).

    The value of the perinatal postmortem examination extends beyond its ascertainment of factors that contributed to death. It may provide the basis for informed genetic counselling; it may challenge or verify diagnoses made by new techniques before death; it serves to monitor possible adverse effects of new treatments; it is a basis …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe