- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- a 208 Governor's Road, Dundas, Ontario L9H 3K1, Canada
- Correspondence to: Dr E J M Campbell.
Abstract
Objective: To assess ability to distinguish between first rate malt whisky and brandy and between different brands of each.
Design: Crossover with two sessions of 12 blindfold tastings of two whiskies and two brandies before and after supper, repeated not more than seven days later.
Setting: Dundas, Ontario. Participants—4 volunteers aged 50-68 years, all moderate drinkers of alcohol and members of a wine club.
Main outcome measures: Proportion of samples correctly identified (whisky v brandy) and, of those, the proportion of brands correctly identified.
Results: Only one participant produced irrefutable statistical evidence (P<0.0001) of being able to distinguish between whisky and brandy, correctly identifying 50/51 (98%) samples. Two participants achieved some success in identification (72%, P=0.0031 and 65% P=0.031). The fourth participant's responses reflected pure guesswork. Brandy was no easier to identify than whisky (P=0.84). The participant who was best able to distinguish between whisky and brandy was also best able to identify correctly the brand of whisky (100%, P<0.0001).
Conclusion: Despite the fact that not all participants completed the full number of tastings the results show that some participants could distinguish neither between malt whisky and brandy nor between different brands of whisky and brandy. However, the success of one participant shows that “it can be done” and that his whisky specific ability is acquired not innate.
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012