Letters

Author's reply

BMJ 1994; 309 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6969.1662c (Published 17 December 1994) Cite this as: BMJ 1994;309:1662
  1. Eva Grunfeld
  1. Assistant professor, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

    EDITOR,—S J A Powis is concerned that we did not consider clinical circumstances in our definition of delay. This is not correct. All the medical records in the 145 cases were reviewed by a clinician, and the review took into account the complete clinical picture according to the medical records. When a delay in mammography was found …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe