Author's replyBMJ 1994; 309 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6969.1662c (Published 17 December 1994) Cite this as: BMJ 1994;309:1662
- Eva Grunfeld
- Assistant professor, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
EDITOR,—S J A Powis is concerned that we did not consider clinical circumstances in our definition of delay. This is not correct. All the medical records in the 145 cases were reviewed by a clinician, and the review took into account the complete clinical picture according to the medical records. When a delay in mammography was found …