Editorials

Finding a way through the cost and benefit maze

BMJ 1994; 309 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1314 (Published 19 November 1994) Cite this as: BMJ 1994;309:1314
  1. A Szczepura

    Two months ago the NHS Executive sent its letter “Improving the effectiveness of the NHS” to all district general managers, chief executives of trusts, and family health services authorities (for distribution to general practice fundholders).1,2 Earlier letters had drawn their attention to the NHS research and development programme and existing evidence on clinical effectiveness3 and asked them to purchase less during 1995-6 of two or more procedures known to be ineffective and more of at least two effective ones.4 The most recent letter outlines the close links between this process and the new NHS research and development strategy. In its turn, the requirement to identify effective procedures should focus an intense spotlight on available research findings and have profound implications for future NHS research, especially since effectiveness covers “costs, outcomes, and acceptability to patients and society.”5

    It is salutary to examine the degree to which current research findings can provide this information for interventions used after myocardial infarctions. Coronary heart disease is the most …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe